An intriguing new cosmic model—proposed in a Brighter Side report—has shaken fundamental cosmological assumptions. Leveraging recent James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) discoveries, physicists at the University of Ottawa argue that the universe age could be approximately 26.7 billion years old—nearly double the current standard estimate of 13.8 billion years.
This striking revision is rooted in JWST’s detection of “impossible early galaxies”—fully formed galactic disks and bulges emerging just 500–800 million years post–Big Bang, a period traditionally thought to feature only chaotic proto-galaxies. To reconcile this, a team led by Rajendra Gupta revives and updates two decades-old concepts. First, the “tired light” hypothesis suggests photons lose energy en route through space, mimicking cosmic redshift. Second, variable “coupling constants”—inspired by Dirac’s 1930s theory—imply that fundamental constants could evolve, stretching cosmic timelines well beyond accepted limits.
Gupta’s hybrid model contends that combining redshift dynamics with evolving constants accounts for both early galaxy maturity and anomalously aged stars—like the so-called Methuselah star, whose age has previously challenged standard cosmology. By that logic, the true universe age lands near 26.7 billion years, offering a fresh lens on cosmic evolution.
From a scientific standpoint, if validated, this model would demand a profound rethink: recalibrated timelines for galaxy formation, star evolution, and even dark matter dynamics. It might also wreck common assumptions about exponential inflation, cosmic microwave background records, and the pace of structure emergence.
Skepticism is high, though. Critics—echoed by sources like Astronomy.com—warn that “tired light” has failed historical validation and that adding mutable constants may resemble curve-fitting, lacking a physical mechanism or predictive rigor. They also note that hybrid mainstream models already accommodate early galaxy formation through rapid starburst phases, without re-dating the universe age.
For cosmologists, the implications are massive. Key legacy constraints—like the cosmic microwave background, nucleosynthesis, and large-scale structure growth—would need re-evaluation. If the universe is older, so too are its oldest stars and galaxies, and perhaps the fundamental laws of physics we observe today.
Culturally and philosophically, this discovery may reshape humanity’s cosmic timeline—offering more “cosmic calendar” space before the Big Bang and expanding the timeframe of cosmic evolution. It challenges our place in the universe and could reignite interest in alternative cosmologies long sidelined by mainstream science.
Source: The Brighter Side
Related
Source link
