Dr. Matt Elmes is a cannabinoid scientist and hashish fanatic. His PhD and postdoctoral work centered on the biochemistry of cannabinoids and he made impactful analysis contributions previous to transitioning to a non-academic profession within the California hashish trade.
You hear it out of your buddies and your budtenders alike. If you happen to’re trying to hashish to higher your sleep, then CBN (cannabinol) is the cannabinoid for you!
As each a hashish scientist and a product formulator throughout the hashish trade, I’ve spent a substantial period of time wanting into the validity of those soporific claims. I discover the minor cannabinoids to be fascinating and I all the time prefer to assessment what goal proof we’ve substantiating a given impact that they might produce. Regardless of the overwhelming status CBN has for enhancing sleep, I used to be shocked to seek out little actual knowledge within the printed literature to truly help these claims.
My sentiments have been echoed in a current assessment article, printed within the journal Hashish and Cannabinoid Analysis, which lays out a scientific abstract of practically all of the high-quality human analysis that has been printed round CBN.[1] Enable me to reiterate the writer’s factors and embrace some extra ideas of my very own with the hope that this can assist readers kind an informed opinion about CBN.
First issues first: What’s CBN?
Cannabinol was the very first cannabinoid to be remoted from the hashish plant within the late 1800s. Now we have since discovered that CBN is a degradant product of THC. Which means THC will slowly remodel into CBN over time as hashish ages. Older bud will usually include larger CBN ranges on the expense of its THC content material. Gentle and warmth will speed up this conversion course of, which is a part of the rationale it’s sometimes beneficial to retailer your hashish in a cool, darkish place.
Laboratory research present that CBN interacts with our CB1 cannabinoid receptors about 10 occasions weaker than ∆9–THC. Because of this CB1 affinity, CBN in all probability does have some weak psychoactive properties in people (extra on why I say “in all probability” later on this article). CBN binds to CB2 receptors with larger affinity in comparison with CB1, so there may be motive to imagine that it may have some helpful anti-inflammatory results much like THC.
Scientists are capable of decide how tightly a compound attaches to a receptor. That is expressed as a Oki (pronounced “Kay-Eye”) worth. A decrease quantity signifies stronger binding, which normally means larger efficiency for a drug. ∆9–THC’s binding affinity to the CB1 receptor = 21nM (nanomolar); that is roughly 10 occasions stronger than CBN’s binding affinity to CB1, which = 211nM.[2,3] CBN’s binding affinity for CB2 receptors is relatively a bit stronger, with CB2 Ki = 126nM.[2]
What Does the Analysis Say About CBN & ZZZ’s?
I don’t wish to put an excessive amount of emphasis on all of the preclinical CBN analysis that’s been achieved in animals as a result of what happens in a rodent all too continuously interprets poorly to what occurs in a human. A very powerful and related factors from the animal knowledge is that they often agree that CBN exhibits weak cannabimimetic exercise (i.e., displays weak THC-like results in assessments which were developed to gauge CB1 receptor activation). Nevertheless, there doesn’t appear to be a robust consensus by some means on CBN’s results on sleep. Some research have discovered that CBN elevated barbiturate-induced sleep time (in a rodent mannequin), however different research appear to contradict these findings[3,4]. CBN didn’t seem to have any impact in any respect when given to monkeys.[5]
In an identical vein, I’ll solely be discussing in-human CBN analysis that’s of high-quality. Not all analysis that’s carried out is of the identical caliber. Numerous observational or survey-based research have concluded efficacy of CBN for sleep (corresponding to right here and right here). Nevertheless, these research are continuously funded by trade gamers with vested pursuits and infrequently don’t have a ample high quality of examine design to place a lot inventory of their outcomes or conclusions. If the analysis shouldn’t be peer-reviewed, depends solely on self-reported subjective measurements, and doesn’t embrace any placebo management, then the ‘outcomes’ don’t carry a lot weight.
Right here’s why: If you happen to give nearly any affected person inhabitants a CBN tincture and ask them to “take it every day and report how a lot it improved their sleep,” the outcomes will nearly all the time come again constructive, even when the results are impartial in actuality. If you happen to as a substitute gave these sufferers a cannabinoid-free tincture (aka a placebo) however lie and inform the contributors that it comprises CBN, these outcomes will nearly all the time be constructive too! Merely believing that one thing you’re taking will exert some impact is usually sufficient to manifest the belief of that impact.
Most individuals are likely to underestimate the energy of placebo results, however medical researchers have strategies to find out whether or not an impact being measured actually outpaces that of a placebo. The human psyche is so highly effective that it’s tough to overstate the significance of correct examine design when assessing proof.

The Subsequent Ambien?
A literature search reveals there have been 9 high-quality medical analysis research that probe the results of CBN on human topics. All these research underwent the peer-review course of, have been printed in revered scientific journals, and at naked minimal have been placebo-controlled or carried out in an appropriately blinded trend.
It must be famous that the majority of those research weren’t centered on sleep per se, and I suppose it’s doable that CBN may assist in some side of sleep in a fashion that eluded these experimental designs. Nonetheless, given all of the anecdotal discuss CBN being “the following Ambien,” you’d assume that there would no less than be some drowsy impact seen by any of the various contributors that consumed large doses of CBN. But every one of these folks couldn’t even discern any impact in any respect when taking THC-free preparations of CBN!
See the Appendix on the finish of this text for a curated, chronological abstract of what every of those 9 research entailed in addition to their main conclusions. Of the 9 high-quality medical research listed within the Appendix, solely two may probably point out any indicators of sleepy results for CBN. So these benefit additional dialogue and significant evaluation.
Drugged, Drowsy, Drunk & Dizzy
Carried out within the early Nineteen Seventies, a examine (listed as #4 within the Appendix) performed at Escola Paulista de Medicina in Brazil concerned 5 male volunteers of their late twenties who have been orally given a distinct cannabinoid or mixture of cannabinoids – they took placebo; 50mgCBN; or 25mgTHC + both 0mg, 12.5mg, 25mg, or 50mg CBN.
The publication describes 4 of the 5 volunteers as being “psychiatric residents at Escola Paulista de Medicina.” Nevertheless, it’s not clear to me whether or not this implies these males have been residents on the psychiatric hospital (as in, post-medical diploma clinicians in-training). Or in the event that they have been residents at the psychiatric hospital (as in, sufferers residing in a psych ward?!). I believe there’s an honest likelihood that it’s the latter.
Recruiting psych ward inpatients for a examine like this might in all probability be frowned upon by modern-day Ethics Evaluation Boards, however this work was carried out in Brazil practically 5 many years in the past once I suspect medical analysis was carried out a bit in another way than it’s at present. If the examine’s contributors have been additionally resident sufferers, then that ought to elevate some considerations round how consultant this cohort is to the overall inhabitants – and whether or not the outcomes may have been confounded by the contributors concurrently taking different psychotropic drugs.
Be that as it could, the contributors have been every requested to charge 66 subjective pairs – corresponding to ‘happy-sad’, ‘drowsy-alert’, ’hot-cold’, & ‘drunk-sober’– and to point which they felt and the way strongly they felt it on a scale from 1 to 4. Consuming 50mg of CBN alone was discovered to not be any totally different from taking placebo on any subjective results or on coronary heart charge. Vital variations, together with “drowsy,” have been solely reported in 4 of the sixty-six subjective results, and solely when CBN was taken together with THC.[10] The 4 results that reached statistical significance have been “Drugged, Drowsy, Drunk, and Dizzy”.
For my part the numerous variations that have been discovered seem uninspiring to say the least. The reader can try the leads to Determine 1 of the printed examine right here. The particular THC+CBN doses that reached significance seem haphazard, with out a lot semblance of an anticipated dose-response. Generally the bottom and highest dose of CBN confirmed an impact however not the center dose, or the bottom dose had an impact however not any of the upper doses. These observations are somewhat odd from a pharmacology perspective.
My greatest gripe with this examine is that with their check scoring 66 objects on 4 totally different CBN teams (equaling a grand complete of 264 comparisons being drawn), a few of them are sure to end up statistically vital just by sheer likelihood. That’s what we name a ‘Sort I Error’ in statistics, and I believe there could also be a few of that at play right here. Mainly, the bigger the variety of belongings you independently check towards one another, the bigger the probability of getting some false positives in your dataset. Furthermore, the extraordinarily small pattern dimension (there have been solely 5 folks on this complete examine!) will increase the possibility that these findings on CBN on ‘drugged, drowsy, drunk, & dizzy’ could also be nothing greater than statistical noise.
Latest Advances for Cannabinoid-Based mostly Medicines & Insomnia
Subsequent we flip to a current Section 1a/2b medical trial (listed as examine #9 within the Appendix) by the pharmaceutical start-up Zelira Therapeutics, though the experimental design, conduct, and evaluation have been independently carried out by College of Western Australia’s Heart for Sleep Science. Zelira’s drug, known as ZTL-101, is a hashish extract with three purified cannabinoids (THC+CBN+CBD) in sunflower oil supposed for sublingual utility. It’s formulated as a THC:CBN:CBD ratio of 20:2:1.
The examine enrolled 24 contributors experiencing continual insomnia, and for 2 weeks they took both a placebo or 0.5mL ZTL-101 (=10mgTHC+1mgCBN+0.5mgCBD) every evening one hour previous to their desired bedtime. After the fourth evening the contributors have been permitted to optionally double their dose to 1mL (=20mgTHC+2mgCBN+1mgCBD).
The examine utilized a cross-over design, which means that after two weeks all of the sufferers receiving placebo have been switched to ZTL-101, and vice versa. Every participant being a part of each the placebo group and the drug group at totally different factors helps management for inter-person variance and significantly improves the energy of a examine like this.
The researchers assessed sleep high quality in three distinct methods: Self-reported sleep diaries, actigraphy (carrying a watch which screens nighttime motion) and a single evening of polysomnography measurements (a complete evaluation of mind waves, coronary heart charge, blood O2 ranges, leg, and eye motion).
No statistically vital variations have been uncovered between the placebo and ZTL-101 teams by the one evening of polysomnography measurements. Nevertheless, the sleep diaries and actigraphy measurements indicated that ZTL-101 considerably improved insomnia severity scores, diminished time it took to go to sleep, lessened nighttime wakefulness, elevated complete sleep time, and the sufferers reported waking up feeling extra rested.
Total, the outcomes appear convincing sufficient to conclude that ZTL-101 considerably diminished insomnia severity scores and elevated sleep high quality in these sufferers. That is nice! It’s one other piece of proof supporting efficacy of cannabinoid-based therapies in sleep drugs. Nevertheless, it appears more likely that it’s actually the THC that’s behind these results, somewhat than the comparatively miniscule quantities of CBN or CBD.
In lots of different research THC-only preparations have certainly demonstrated self-reported sleep advantages (albeit with some seeming contradictions within the analysis round this).6 As this examine solely examined CBN together with THC and CBD, there may be actually no solution to know till additional comparative research are carried out. If greater than 1000mgCBN/day didn’t exhibit any type of noticeable sleepy results, then it’s doubtful that the 1-2mgCBN used on this examine did a lot in that regard.

THC Alters Sleep Structure
The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is entwined with our sleep and dreaming in ways in which we’re nonetheless striving to completely perceive. We all know that heavy hashish customers usually dream much less (or no less than, don’t keep in mind their goals very properly). After which upon abstention from hashish they typically have issue falling asleep, and as soon as they do go to sleep, they have an inclination to expertise very vivid goals. We all know that the ECS helps to manage circadian sleep-wake cycles and these observations level in direction of hashish with the ability to induce alterations in our sleep structure.
Excessive-quality sleep research haven’t discovered CBD to change sleep structure, and I’m not conscious of any reported dream rebound results after abstaining from continual CBD use.[7] The principle issue behind the sleep-related results of hashish appears to be THC. The analysis round how THC impacts our sleep is a bit convoluted, however it’s usually believed to shorten sleep onset latency (aka time it takes to go to sleep), to extend gradual wave sleep, and to shorten the REM phases of sleep [6].
Consuming CBN isolate might weakly stimulate your ECS and this conceivably may assist some sides of sleep. Nevertheless, mechanistically this shouldn’t be any totally different than taking a really low dose of THC. Additionally, traditionally nearly no one has even tried CBN isolate as a result of there’ll just about all the time be some contaminating THC in high-CBN hashish. If tickling the CB1 receptor is certainly how CBN works, then there in all probability wouldn’t be a lot actual synergy between THC and CBN as a result of the THC would strongly out-compete CBN for CB1 receptor binding. In different phrases, including some CBN to a THC product (like most CBN merchandise at the moment available on the market) mustn’t make it have sleepier results.
So, if CBN isn’t sleep-inducing, then the place did this rumor originate? Traditionally aged hashish has been related to producing extra sedating results. When it grew to become extra widespread information that CBN is the most important degradation product of THC, folks started attributing these results to the comparatively larger CBN content material that’s present in previous flower.
Terpenes & Terpenoids
Whereas it’s probably true that older hashish tends to supply extra sedating results, I doubt that it’s the CBN that’s inflicting this. Hashish is a posh combination of many 1000’s of chemical constituents, and THC shouldn’t be the one compound that converts into one thing else over time. Phytochemicals in crops are consistently degrading or altering in varied methods as time passes. Acidic cannabinoids decarboxylate into their impartial counterparts or oxidize into varied minor cannabinoids. Terpenes can incorporate oxygen atoms from the air changing them into terpenoids (corresponding to linalool) which can exhibit comparatively extra sedating results.
The phrases ‘terpene’ and ‘terpenoid’ are sometimes used synonymously, however technically terpenes are solely hydrocarbons (which means they include solely carbons and hydrogens), whereas terpenoids include extra purposeful teams, normally an integrated oxygen atom.
Moreover, aged hashish may need a better ratio of sesquiterpenes (aka ‘heavy terps’; corresponding to beta-caryophyllene) as a result of the opposite primary number of terpene that the hashish plant makes, monoterpenes (‘mild terps’; corresponding to limonene), are comparatively extra risky and subsequently evaporate away from plant matter extra readily. The altered terpene profiles in aged hashish may feasibly result in extra sedating or sleepy results.
In-human analysis on terpene pharmacology is woefully missing, however many terpenes have been demonstrated in animal fashions to supply vital analgesic and sedative results.[8,9] Curiously, many of those results could be blocked by giving the rodent naloxone (aka Narcan), suggesting that some terpenes are no less than partially working by our endogenous opioid system.
Word that terpenes themselves should not opioids as they’re usually not capable of activate opioid receptors. However some terpenes might improve our physique’s manufacturing of pure opioids and/or act as constructive allosteric modulators to opioid receptors. A constructive allosteric modulator interacts with receptors in such a manner that makes them extra vulnerable to activation by different compounds (which scientists seek advice from as “agonists”).

CBN Conclusions
CBN has seen a giant surge within the hashish market not too long ago and producers have jumped on the alternative to extensively promote its anecdotal status for being a sleep-aid. Nevertheless, primarily based on the prior analysis that has been carried out it seems that there are not any particular sleepy properties for this minor cannabinoid. Though there’s a whole lot of rumour anecdotal help for CBN as a soporific, I stay doubtful about these widespread claims.
The medical analysis on CBN remains to be manner too missing to kind a whole understanding of its pharmacology. Whereas it’s doable that there are nonetheless yet-uncovered mechanisms of motion for CBN that may assist sleep, I’ve not seen something strong to help this idea. In all probability, the alleged sleep-assisting property of CBN is nothing greater than an unfounded rumor that may be principally attributed to 2 issues. First is that traditionally folks have seen that older hashish offered extra sedating results and mistakenly linked it to degraded THC. Second is that placebo could be one hell of a robust drug!
Appendix: 9 Research
What follows is a curated, chronological abstract of 9 high-quality medical analysis research that probe the results of CBN on human topics. All these research underwent the peer-review course of, have been printed in revered scientific journals, and at naked minimal have been placebo-controlled or carried out in an appropriately blinded trend. I’ve briefly summarized what every of those research entailed in addition to their main conclusions:
CBN Examine #1
- Location: North Carolina, USA; College of North Carolina College of Drugs Chapel Hill
- Principal Writer: Dr. Mario Perez-Reyes
- Yr: 1973
- Individuals: Six wholesome male volunteers
- The Examine: Individuals got an i.v. and drug-free saline was infused instantly into their bloodstream. The topics have been knowledgeable that at some unspecified time the saline would get replaced with an answer of CBN given at a relentless charge of 1.2mgCBN/min. It took round 14mg of CBN injected instantly into the blood for the contributors to start perceiving any subjective results. They reported that the results have been pleasing, however notably much less intense than these elicited by THC. A rise in coronary heart charge was noticed at larger doses which serves as a affirmation that CBN is ready to activate our CB1 receptors (CB1 activation is well-known to do that…consuming THC will increase your coronary heart charge too!).[10]
CBN Examine #2
- Location: Palo Alto, California, USA; Veterans Administration Medical Heart
- Principal Writer: Dr. Leo Hollister
- Yr: 1973
- Individuals: Six middle-aged male volunteers. All had some prior expertise utilizing hashish.
- The Examine: The volunteers got 20-400mg CBN orally (in a chocolate cookie). No psychological or bodily results of CBN have been noticed at any dose. This seemingly contrasts the findings of the earlier CBN Examine #1, the place CBN was described as offering a lightweight excessive and barely elevated coronary heart charge when instantly injected into the bloodstream. Taking 400mg of CBN orally ought to attain blood concentrations even larger than what was utilized in CBN Examine #1, so the disparity in these outcomes is a bit shocking.[11]
CBN Examine #3
- Location: Palo Alto, California, USA; Veterans Administration Medical Heart & Stanford College College of Drugs
- Principal Authors: Dr. Leo Hollister & Hampton Gillespie
- Yr: 1975
- Individuals: Fifteen wholesome male volunteers. All had some restricted prior publicity to hashish use.
- The Examine: The identical researcher that carried out CBN Examine #2 got here again to do one other CBN examine a pair years later. This time he gave the contributors a cookie with 20mg THC plus both 40mg CBN or placebo. The 40mg CBN didn’t seem to do something as there have been no detectable variations between the ‘THC+CBN’ group vs. the ‘THC+placebo’ therapy teams. Within the writer’s phrases “…no quantitative or temporal distinction was noticed between THC-placebo and THC–CBN by way of medical results. Qualitatively, every therapy produced an identical results.”[12]
CBN Examine #4
- Location: Sau Paulo, Brazil; Escola Paulista de Medicina
- Principal Writer: Dr. Isac Karniol
- Yr: 1975
- Individuals: 5 male volunteers of their late twenties. 4 of the 5 volunteers have been psychiatric residents at Escola Paulista de Medicina. The opposite was an architect.
- The Examine: Individuals have been orally given placebo, 50mgCBN, 25mgTHC, or THC together with varied doses of CBN between 0-50mg. The contributors have been every requested to reply 66 subjective pairs (e.g. alert-drowsy, happy-sad, euphoric-depressed, and many others.) with which they felt and to charge how strongly they felt it on a scale from 1-4. Determine #1 from the printed examine exhibits the outcomes of a choose 4 of the 66 subjective pair solutions. Consuming 50mg of CBN was discovered to not be any totally different from taking placebo on subjective results or coronary heart charge. When the topics obtained combos of THC + CBN there have been typically vital variations discovered, together with “drowsy” with some THC+CBN combos.[13]
CBN Examine #5
- Location: Australia; College of New South Wales
- Principal Writer: Dr. Kevin Chook
- Yr: 1980
- Individuals: 161 wholesome volunteers (122 males + 39 girls). Many of the contributors have been school college students. Ages ranged from 18-36 years previous.
- The Examine: The topics have been orally given 320µg/kg CBN (~25mg for an average-sized grownup), both alone or together with 215µg/kg THC (= ~16mg), after which subjected to a collection of cognitive, notion, response time, and motor operate assessments. The authors concluded that CBN was with out impact on any of the parameters that they examined. Consuming CBN together with THC didn’t present any variations in comparison with taking THC alone.[14]
CBN Examine #6
- Location: Palo Alto, California, USA; Veterans Administration Medical Heart
- Principal Authors: Drs. Leo Hollister & Stig Agurell
- Yr: 1981
- Individuals: Twelve male volunteers between ages 18-40. All had prior expertise utilizing hashish.
- The Examine: Yet one more one from Dr. Hollister’s staff. This time they performed a examine specializing in whether or not CBN alters how our our bodies metabolize THC. They used the identical therapy situation as of their earlier examine (20mgTHC + both placebo or 40mgCBN, orally consumed). They didn’t observe any vital variations between the CBN vs. placebo teams.[15]
CBN Examine #7
- Location: Los Angeles, California, USA; College of California Division of Drugs
- Principal Writer: Dr. Henry Gong Jr.
- Yr: 1984
- Individuals: 59 wholesome males between ages 21-32. All topics have been recurring hashish customers.
- The Examine: Individuals orally consumed 100mg, 600mg, or 1200mg CBN every day for 20 consecutive days. Subjective self-rated ‘highness scores’ have been no totally different than that of placebo at any dose of CBN. Even on the highest 1200mg dose CBN didn’t alter coronary heart charge. Twelve of the contributors have been then enrolled in a second a part of the examine the place they obtained 400mg CBN together with 5mg THC. CBN didn’t seem to have any impact on coronary heart charge or subjective excessive induced by THC.[16]
CBN Examine #8
- Location: Uppsala, Sweden; Uppsalla College
- Yr: 1987
- Principal Authors: Drs. Leo Hollister & Eva Johansson
- Individuals: Six wholesome male volunteers between ages 19-31. All have been skilled hashish customers however abstained from hashish use for no less than 72 hours previous to the experiment.
- The Examine: The main target of this examine was to measure blood CBN ranges following smoked vs. intravenous routes of administration (this type of experiment is named a ‘pharmacokinetics’ or ‘PK’ examine). Individuals got a 20mg i.v. infusion of CBN. Then, one week later, similar contributors smoked a THC-free joint containing 20mg CBN. Whereas subjective results have been not likely a spotlight of this examine, the authors famous that neither smoked nor injected CBN produced any noticeable psychoactive results.[17]
CBN Examine #9
- Location: Australia; West Australian Sleep Problems Analysis Institute & the College of Western Australia
- Yr: 2021
- Principal Writer: Dr. Jennifer Walsh
- Individuals: 24 volunteers (20 girls + 4 males) with continual insomnia. Ages ranged from 25-70 years previous.
- The Examine: This current medical trial checked out ZTL-101 (a proprietary mixture of THC+CBN+CBD at a ratio of 20:2:1) for the therapy of continual insomnia. The contributors took ZTL-101 sublingually every day for 2 weeks and it considerably improved insomnia signs and self-reported sleep high quality in comparison with the placebo group.[18]
Copyright, Mission CBD. Will not be reprinted with out permission.