Starmer says he wants ‘more pensioners’ to get winter fuel payments in U-turn

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Sir Keir Starmer has said he wants more pensioners to be eligible for winter fuel payments, in an apparent U-turn on one of the most unpopular policies of the Labour leader’s premiership.

“We want to ensure that as we go forward more pensioners are eligible for winter fuel payments,” the UK prime minister told MPs on Wednesday. “We will only make decisions we can afford.”

“We will look at that as part of a fiscal event,” he said, adding that he would look specifically at the threshold at which people are eligible for the payments to widen participation. The next Budget will be in the autumn.

Labour received a drubbing at local elections in England this month, with the government’s decision to cut winter fuel payments after winning power last year cited as one of the top frustrations raised by voters.

Starmer’s comments mark a sharp reversal just two weeks after Downing Street ruled out making changes to winter fuel payments.

The prime minister’s spokesman was unable to confirm whether any changes would take place in time for the coming winter.

If the Budget is held — as last year’s was — in October, that leaves only a limited window between an official announcement and the start of winter.

The government has faced continuing uproar over its decision last July to axe £1.5bn in winter fuel payments for around 10mn pensioners.

The cut limited the payments of either £200 or £300 a year to pensioners in England and Wales who receive means-tested pensions credit. It also only applies to those with incomes lower than around £11,800 a year for a single person or £18,000 for a couple.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the deeply unpopular policy shortly after taking office, arguing it was necessary to fill a £22bn black hole in the government’s finances left by the previous Conservative administration.

There were shouts of “U-turn” from the opposition benches as Starmer announced his ambition to water down the policy on Wednesday.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch described Starmer as a “desperate prime minister”, and asked how the hundreds of Labour MPs who voted for the policy could trust him again.

Badenoch’s spokesperson said it was clearly a “political decision, not a financial one”, despite the government framing the move as necessary to save government money.

Policy analysts said framing a new test would be a conundrum for officials.

“It’s not easy,” said Stuart Adam, senior economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies. “One reason they chose this approach is that there aren’t great alternatives.”

He said one option could be to widen eligibility for the payment to recipients of housing or disability benefits, though the former would apply only to those in rented property, and the latter are not means-tested.

Changing the income threshold for pensions credit itself would add extra cost and would be akin to “the tail wagging the dog”, Adam said.

Whatever approach ministers take, the fiscal impact is likely to be modest, in the context of the much bigger cuts elsewhere in the welfare system.

Doubling the number of people who qualify for winter fuel payments would carry a cost to the exchequer in the low hundreds of millions, Adam said.

Meanwhile, Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, said at an event earlier on Wednesday that the government would press ahead with cuts of £4.8bn to sickness and disability benefits, because the current system was “not sustainable or fair”, although she was “listening carefully” to concerns.

The government has also so far resisted pressure to scrap the two-child benefits cap put in place by the previous Conservative administration — a change that would cost £3.5bn.

Alison Garnham, chief executive of the Child Poverty Action Group, said the two-child limit was “the elephant in the room” as Kendall delivered her speech, with the policy “pushing child poverty to a new high on this government’s watch”.