Most Shared

Social Security benefits could face cuts by 2033. Here’s how to plan for the worst-case scenario.

Listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts.

The Social Security trust fund could be depleted by early 2033, triggering 23% across-the-board benefit cuts for all recipients. This sobering reality from the latest trustees report has retirement experts sounding the alarm about the need for immediate action and creative solutions.

Marcia Mantell, president of Mantell Retirement Consulting, recently discussed the implications of the 2025 Social Security trustees report on the “Decoding Retirement” podcast, providing actionable advice for Americans facing this potential crisis.

The trustees report, released in mid-June, painted a concerning picture of Social Security’s financial health. While the depletion date for the Old Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) fund remained at 2033 — consistent with last year’s projection — the timeline has actually accelerated.

“Instead of the end of 2033 depleting the reserve account, it’s now the beginning of 2033,” Mantell explained. “So it’s a problem.”

The acceleration stems from several factors, including the Social Security Fairness Act, which restored benefits to previously excluded government workers; declining fertility rates; and a worsening worker-to-retiree ratio. Currently, fewer than three workers support each beneficiary, down from more than five workers per beneficiary in 1960.

The crisis extends beyond Social Security. The Medicare Part A trust fund, which covers hospital insurance, is now projected to be depleted by 2033 — three years earlier than previously forecast.

“I was surprised, though, on the Medicare side that the Part A … is projected to be depleted,” Mantell said. “The reserve account [is] to be depleted three years earlier, also in 2033.”

She noted that healthcare expenses typically rise at about twice the rate of general inflation, making the Medicare trust fund particularly vulnerable. However, she expressed optimism about Medicare’s Innovation Center, which “continually look[s] for innovative ways to help with both quality of care and pricing.”

To illustrate the potential devastation, Mantell highlighted some scenarios for different income levels.

For instance, a couple where both spouses earned high wages throughout their careers and delayed claiming until age 70 would see an annual benefit of $89,000 before cuts. But after a 23% reduction, they would receive an annual benefit of $68,000 — an annual loss of $20,000.


Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button