Prince Ricardo De La Cerda Warning DOGE is Unconstitutional

Episode Notes: “Prince Ricardo De La Cerda: Warning DOGE is Unconstitutional”

Introduction:

• Overview of the seismic shifts expected in American democracy as Donald Trump approaches a potential second term.

Main Content:

1. The Myth of DOGE:
   • Introduction to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), purportedly co-headed by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy.
   • Discussion on how despite being a legal fiction, DOGE is being debated by Republicans in Congress and the media as if it's a real entity.
   • Insight into the roles of Sen. Joni Ernst and other politicians who are driving the narrative around DOGE.
   • Legal analysis explaining that only Congress has the authority to create federal agencies, highlighting the unconstitutional nature of DOGE.
2. Trump's Influence on Presidential Powers:
   • Examination of how Trump's presidency has influenced the Supreme Court's decisions, particularly concerning the immunity of presidents.
   • Discussion on the precedent set by Trump for potentially using presidential powers for personal or political gains.
3. Constitutional Boundaries and Overreach:
   • Detailed look at the powers of federal agencies, the checks and balances intended by the constitution, and how these are being overlooked in current discussions.
   • Analysis of the Administrative Procedure Act and other laws that regulate agency actions, aiming to prevent overreach and ensure accountability.
4. The 22nd Amendment Debate:
   • Overview of the ongoing debates regarding the 22nd Amendment and the implications of a potential third term for Trump.
   • Arguments and legal interpretations being considered, stressing the clear language of the Constitution limiting presidential terms.

Closing Thoughts:

• Reflection on the implications of these developments for the future of American democracy.
• Commentary on the normalization of these unprecedented shifts and the potential long-term effects on the constitutional separation of powers.
• Call to action for listeners to engage in the conversation and remain informed about these critical issues.

Conclusion:

• Summary of the main points discussed.
• Reminder of the importance of constitutional integrity and the potential irreversible impacts of undermining it.